Thursday, May 28, 2009

Utilizing Problem Based Learning Methods for Constructionism and Constructivism

According to Dr. Orey’s (2009) presentation, constructivism is a where students create a specific definition to for something general (Laureate Education, Inc, 2009). Thus, this is an example of retrieving prior knowledge to build upon; this process is called assimilation (Laureate Education, Inc, 2009). If in a given situation, students are unable to assimilate, then students will need to reserve the new information in a new place by accommodation (Laureate Education, Inc, 2009). Once this is this is achieved and then equilibration will eventually be reached when “a balance between differences in external reality and one’s current beliefs and understanding” happens (Laureate Education, Inc, 2009). So students start out as Constructivist and later have enough understanding to become a Constructionist. The tools that were to be explored this week were fascinating. Problem based solving is a great way for students to use their prior knowledge to discover something new that is to be learned. As one of my cohorts said, “It’s great to present a define problem and end up with an ill-define solution.” This meant that a problem is presented and the ending will not be expected to be the same every time. This is where students learn most, because it allows students to generate questions and hypothesis to answer them. After all, “When students generate and test hypotheses, they are engaging in complex mental processes, applying content knowledge like facts and vocabulary, and enhancing their overall understanding of the content.” (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, Malenoski, 2007, p 202). With problem based learning, the highest of learning is taking place. The one I really enjoy and still figuring out was the Problem Based Learning where you are able to create your problem based activity. Students are also using their senses and are constructing, thus the possibility for students to retrieve the information will be greater. If this is achieved, then we are making a difference in our students’ lives.

1 comment:

  1. Constructivism reminds me of our last course on behaviour management when they talked about contraversy being a good thing...most people view it as bad...when in fact it means the people are engaged. With constructivism, people are engaged (a positive active state) in trying to reach equilibrium...not knowing something is not always a bad thing if you are engaged and trying to make sense in your mind about it (you are engaged)...the worse thing for me as a teacher is when my students are not engaged...I know there is no hope of them making sense of what they are working on...what do you think Jennifer?

    ReplyDelete